Introduction:
Brute-force search or exhaustive search is a trivial but very general
problem-solving technique, that consists of systematically enumerating
all possible candidates for the solution and checking whether each
candidate satisfies the problem's statement. The main disadvantage of
the brute-force method is that, for many real-world problems, the
number of natural candidates is prohibitively large. The DES secret key
encryption algorithm uses a key that is 56 bits, or seven characters
long. At the time it was believed that trying out all
72,057,594,037,927,936 possible keys (a seven with 16 zeros) would be
impossible because computers could not possibly ever become fast
enough. In 1998 the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) built a
special-purpose machine that could decrypt a message by trying out all
possible keys in less than three days. The machine cost less than
$250,000 and searched over 88 billion keys per second. Today, with the
introduction of Parallel computers and distributed problem
solving, the paradigm of Brute force searches in cryptography has
dramatically transformed. Distributed.net, the subject of this work, is
one such distributed service which aims at using the idle time of
millions of PC's to solve more and more ambitious problems of
decryption.
Distributed.net:
The objective of distributed.net is to deploy software to form an
immense, globally distributed computer that solves large-scale problems
and provides an accessible pool of computational power to projects that
need it. This deployment also aims at demonstrating the
real-world utility of both distributed computing in general and for
their software in particular. Currently the problems that are being
solved by distributed.net are as follows.
- RC5-72:
Having successfully completed RC5-56 and RC5-64, Distributed.net
is now working on the 72-bit variant of this encryption algorithm.
- Optimal 25 Mark Golomb Rulers:
Essentially, a Golomb Ruler is a mathematical term given to a set of
whole numbers where no two pairs of numbers have the same difference.
An Optimal Golomb Ruler (OGR) is just like an everyday ruler, except
that the marks are placed so that no two pairs of marks measure the
same distance. OGR's have many uses in the real world.
Comment about this project:
-
How well did the application achieve its scientific /
engineering objective? Are simulation results compared to physical
results?
Since this is a distributed problem solver and has succesfully solved
RC5-56 and RC5-64, we can conclude that it has done this task pretty
well. Further, it has won the key challenge which proves that this
model has worked well and they were the first to be able to do this.
-
What type of parallel platform was the application developed
for? (distributed vs. shared memory, vector, etc.) What tools were used
to build the application? (languages, libraries)
This used the distributed approch. The code base was almost exclusively
in C++ which helped in porting it to almost all popular platforms. LibC
is the library of choice.
-
If the application is run on a major supercomputer, where does
that computer rank on the Top 500
list?
This is not on the Top500 list.
-
How well did the application perform? How does this compare to
the platform's best possible performance?
Cryptography
* RSA Lab's 56-bit RC5 Encryption Challenge —
Completed 19 October 1997 (after 250 days and 47% of the key space
tested).
* RSA Lab's 56-bit DES II-1 Encryption Challenge —
Completed 24 February 1998 (after 39 days)
* RSA Lab's 56-bit DES II-2 Encryption Challenge —
Ended 17 July 1998 (found independently by EFF's Deep Crack custom DES
cracker after 2.5 days)
* RSA Lab's 56-bit DES-III Encryption Challenge —
Completed 19 January 1999 (after 22.5 hours with the help of EFF's Deep
Crack custom DES cracker)
* CS-Cipher Challenge — Completed 16 January 2000
(after 60 days and 98% of the key space tested).
By the details above, one could say that the application performed very
well.
Screenshot
Latest Statistics:
Aggregate Statistics
| Total Blocks to Search: |
68,719,476,736 |
| Total Blocks Tested: |
61,250,810,321 |
| Overall Rate: |
394 Blocks/sec |
| Total Keys to Search: |
18,446,744,073,709,552,000 |
| Total Keys Tested: |
16,441,889,198,887,142,000 |
| Overall Rate: |
105,722,024,170 Keys/sec |
| Percent Complete: |
89.132% |
| Time Working: |
1,800 days |
Project
Progress Meter:
Current Information:
38,850,941 Blocks were completed yesterday (0.056536% of the
keyspace)(0.517494% of the remaining keyspace)
at a sustained rate of 450 Blocks/sec.
10,428,970,063,364,096 Keys were completed yesterday (0.056536% of
the keyspace)(0.517494% of the remaining keyspace)
at a sustained rate of 120,705,672,030 Keys/sec.
The odds are 1 in 192 that we will wrap this thing
up in the next 24 hours. (This also means that we'll
hit 100% in 192 days at yesterday's rate.)
There have been 331,464 participants
since the beginning of this project.
25,739 of them were active yesterday
and of those, 26 were brand-new participants.
There are 12,645 registered teams.
3,697 of them submitted work units yesterday.
(0 of them are brand new!)
References:
- RC5-72 project page. distributed.net.
- OGR project page. distributed.net.
- "Macho Computing at Root of RSA Contest Flap", Wired,
1997-03-03.
- distributed.net
History & Timeline. distributed.net.
- distributed.net completes rc5-64 project list
announcement (txt). distributed.net (2002-09-26).
- What's with all the cows?. distributed.net.
- RC5-72 / CPU Participation. distributed.net.
- Plan entry by Greg Hewgill (2004-11-01).