Thursday February 23, 2006
17:42 | Politics
From a piece in the current IEEE
Security and Privacy magazine, the FBI has been gathering data on
individuals from the data aggregator ChoicePoint since 2002. Discovered through
a FOIA request: [...] the FBI Foreign Terrorist Tracking Task Force apparently signed a deal with
ChoicePoint to access records the FBI is forbidden to collect under the 1974
Privacy Act. In 2003, ChoicePoint gave the federal government Internet access
to its service, and then began developing a system exclusively for government
use. Although the Privacy Act forbids the government from collecting certain
records about its citizens, nothing in the law expressly prevents a corporation
from doing so on the government's behalf.
So, the FBI has effectively privatized its data collection operations? How many
other checks and balances on government power are open to this kind of "free
market solution?" Tuesday February 07, 2006
22:06 | Politics
Hot on the heels of reports that Mr. Deutsch took part in a broad
campaign to "limit or flavor
discussions of topics uncomfortable to the Bush administration"
comes news that he has been forced
to resign, ostensibly for falsely claiming to have received a
degree from Texas A&M. Not surprisingly, however, James E. Hansen,
one of the scientists who came forward with claims that he was actively
discouraged from discussing topics such as global warming, warned that
the underlying problem has not yet been addressed: "He's only a bit player," Dr. Hansen said of Mr. Deutsch. "The problem
is much broader and much deeper and it goes across agencies. That's what
I'm really concerned about."
"On climate, the public has been misinformed and not informed," he said. "The foundation of a democracy is an informed public, which obviously means an honestly informed public. That's the big issue here."
"On climate, the public has been misinformed and not informed," he said. "The foundation of a democracy is an informed public, which obviously means an honestly informed public. That's the big issue here."
Sunday February 05, 2006
15:03 | Politics
Simply amazing. From the NYTimes: The Big Bang is "not proven fact; it is opinion," Mr. Deutsch wrote, adding,
"It is not NASA's place, nor should it be to make a declaration such as this
about the existence of the universe that discounts intelligent design by a
creator."
It continued: "This is more than a science issue, it is a religious issue. And I would hate to think that young people would only be getting one-half of this debate from NASA. That would mean we had failed to properly educate the very people who rely on us for factual information the most."
It continued: "This is more than a science issue, it is a religious issue. And I would hate to think that young people would only be getting one-half of this debate from NASA. That would mean we had failed to properly educate the very people who rely on us for factual information the most."
Calendar
| « | February 2006 | » | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | ||||